Britain: ‘It’s not Kosher to criticize Israel’

Peter Wilby, the editor of British magazine the New Statesman has apologized for the publication (February 2002) of a cover illustration (shown at the top) which pro-Israel Brits especially the Zionist Jews have claimed to be anti-Semitic.

Peter Wilby, however, says the magazine remained opposed to the policies of the Zionist regime and reassures readers it was not about to censor itself.

The Jewish lobby groups have also slammed the New Statsement for the publication of the articles by Dennis Sewell, on “Zionist media lobby” in Britain, and by John Pilger, on the relationship between Tony Blair and Ariel Sharon.

Jemima Khan, the ex-wife of the Pakistan politician Imran Khan – is a senior editor at the New Statesman.

Most of the Zionist leaders who have become the defenders of the so-called “Jewish Homeland” – were in fact Nazi collaborators. William James Martin has explained the Nionist-Nazi collaboeration in his July 8th article which can be read here.

In 1896, journalist Theodore Herzl’s book, Der Judenstaat (The Jews’ State), Herzl expressed his understanding of inevitability, permanence, and omnipresence of anti-Semitism and argued that the only solution was a separate state for Jews. Herzl stated, in his book:

“The Jewish question exists wherever Jews live in perceptable numbers. Where it does not exist, it is carried by Jews in the course of their migrations. We naturally move to those places where we are not persecuted, and there our presence produces persecution”.

In 1912, Chaim Weizman, Israel’s first president, and the Zionist advocate who had the most to do with lobbying the British for the Balfour Declaration of 1917, echoed this view, speaking to a Berlin audience:

Each country can absorb only a limited number of Jews, if she doesn’t want disorder in her stomach. Germany already has too many Jews“.

The understanding of Herzl, as well as the Zionists, about the inevitability of anti-Semitism was possibly self-fulfilling, for rather than opposing anti-Semitism in the first half of the 20th century, the Zionists found common cause with Hitler, Eichmann, and the Nazis and used anti-Semitism and Nazism as a means of achieving their end which was the establishment of a Jewish state. The two reactionary movements shared the view that German Jews were living in that country as a ‘foreign race’ and that the racial divide was essential to maintain. The Zionists’ use of Nazism involved, among other things, the blocking of avenues of escape to other countries of Europe’s Jews and diverting them to Palestine, even as the death trains began to roll in Europe. The rise of Nazism and Hitler to power was never, or almost never, opposed by the Zionists prior to the establishment of Israel.

This entry was posted in Propaganda. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Britain: ‘It’s not Kosher to criticize Israel’

  1. Eloides says:

    thanks to your post i can solve some of my problems, thank you.http://www.needpurpose.com

  2. Erin says:

    I love what you guys tend to be up too. Such clever work and exposure! Keep up the good works guys I’ve incorporated you guys to my personal blogroll, I suggest, you can add more variety of topics for example you can write articles with info related with levitra dosage and others.

  3. gold account says:

    Universities UK claim that this is about freedom of speech , but this is at best disingenuous. Put simply, if a speaker is in line with prevailing political orthodoxy, then they will be afforded the benefit of doubt and be permitted to speak. If a speaker contradicts that orthodoxy, then they will often be run off the campus. Ultimately, it is mob rule, as the Universities UK report itself demonstrates with its final sentence, “permission [for meetings] may be withdrawn if adequate arrangements cannot be made to ensure that good order is maintained”. It is to the credit of the National Union of Students that it deals with these issues respectfully and consistently. If only their elders could do likewise, then campus would be a more inviting place for all students, including those who have the courage to speak out against anti-semitism and anti-Zionism.

  4. Elmides says:

    i love your blog, don’t find many that are so clear, it is nice to see that someone really understands. i really enjoyed reading this. thanks for the post.http://www.bmasrl.com

  5. gold price says:

    [Ron: The percentage of Bolshevik Jews exceeded 50% during Lenin’s years in power and Jews predominated during the bloody Red Terror. Moreover criticising Jews was a capital “anti-semitic” crime punishable by death under Lenin and Stalin.] The Zionist media has deliberately entombed these facts because the Holocaust® narrative of “perennial Jewish victimhood” wouldn’t hold as much as weight if the world knew that Jews were nothing even remotely close to victims in Bolshevik-Stalinist Russia; they were the rulers, oppressors and tormenters, just like they are in Palestine today. The only difference is the name of the ideology. Bolshevism and Zionism are simply two heads of the same Jewish supremacist dragon. While several top academics have documented the domineering Zionist role in the planning and execution of the destruction of Iraq, most notably Professor John J. Mearsheimer and Professor Steven Walt in their landmark work, “The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy,” as well as Dr. Stephen J. Sniegoski in his masterpiece, “The Transparent Cabal: The Neoconservative Agenda, War in the Middle East, and the National Interest of Israel,” it has not been discussed (at all) that Mossad, the Zionist entity’s international intelligence directorate, has been the chief player in keeping the Iraqi nation in chaos by endlessly planting car bombs and attempting to foment ethno-sectarian war. Very few have spoken above a whisper that the annihilation of Iraq wasn’t just for the “protection” of the usurping ‘Israeli’ regime but for the expansion of it (56).

  6. silver price says:

    This is the reality: The most radical exponents of the most vile form of Jewish racist and supremacist ideology are accusing me, an anti-racist campaigner, of being an anti-Semite. Considering that I lead one of the most ethnically varied musical ensembles on this planet – this accusation is absurd, amusing or sad and probably all three. But here’s the good news. On every possible front they are failing. No matter how much these Zionist supremacists convince themselves that I am the ultimate Jew-hater, they have failed to convince anyone else.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s